| :: Opening Address | :: Morning Panel | :: Afternoon Sessions | :: Other Highlights |
| :: Info Fair Exhibitors | |||
| 2006 CTAUN Conference The Global Challenge of Water Friday, February 3, 2006 |
| Afternoon Special Guest—Mrs. Nane Annan | ||
Nane Annan, lawyer, artist and wife of Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General
Before moving to New York in the early 1980s to pursue her interests in art, Mrs. Annan served as a lawyer in her native Sweden, working in the court system there and subsequently as a legal officer for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Geneva. In her capacity as wife of Secretary-General Kofi Annan, she often travels with him and visits U.N. projects. She is especially interested in issues concerning women and initiatives in which they have a chance to pull themselves out of poverty, beginning with girls’ education. She is also the author of two books for children: The United Nations, Come Along With Me! and Tip and Top, The Adventure of Two Water Drops.
|
| First Afternoon PanelInnovations to Meet the Challenge | |||||
| Carolyn Donovan, Primary NGO Representative for American Association of University Women and member of CTAUN, Moderator. Dr. Pradeep Aggarwal, Programme Manager, Water Resources, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Dr. Aggarwal explained that when a source of water is young and recently derived from rain, it is renewable. When wells contain water that is found to be very old, it must be used with care so as not to exhaust the supply. In discussing water in a desert, he said that the reason there are wells is because at some time in the past the climate was different, there was rain, and it went into underground aquifers. Aquifers are the equivalent to buckets of water underground. His agency works on such projects as tracing the source of arsenic poisoning in water in Bangladesh. They are, for instance, able to trace which aquifers need treatment and which do not. Jim Bodenner, Thirsting to Serve, Rotary Clean Water Projects
Every Rotarian worldwide is being asked to participate in some way in a water project. Mr. Bodenner said that teachers are encouraged to motivate and mobilize their students and develop a willingness to take action. Educators who have an idea for a project are encouraged to contact their local Rotary to see whether a partnership would be possible, or whether there is currently a local Rotary project in which their students could participate. Mr. Bodenner also announced that there would be World Water Day on March 22. For such occasions, sometimes children will organize a “Walk for Water,” carrying a bottle of water for three miles, which is about the distance a woman in a developing country might have to walk for water. Through activities such as this, private organizations can help make governments aware of water as a basic human right. Maria Smith-Nilson, Founder and Executive Director, Water 1st International.
There is a need for new projects to be integrated with others that are being planned or are already in place. There is also a need in all communities for better protection of the water sources. Finally, Ms. Smith-Nilson joined many of the earlier speakers in stressing the importance of women’s involvement in the planning and maintenance of projects. Thomas Clasen, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, representing Verstergaard-Frandsen, Inc.
A LifeStraw is an enlarged drinking straw with built-in filters that will protect one person for about a year. It is particularly useful in preventing waterborne diseases like diarrhea and typhoid fever in emergency situations such as tsunamis, hurricanes, and earthquakes. It is also useful for people when away from home or working in the fields. The company that Mr. Clasen represents is also increasing its production capabilities to manufacture disease-resistant mosquito netting for the private sector. Comment from the Floor
|
| Second Afternoon PanelEngaging Students to Find Solutions. | ||||||
Narin Stassis, First Vice-Chair of CTAUN, and ESL teacher and coordinator for the West Paterson School District in New Jersey, Moderator.
Magano Ickua, Brandeis University student; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs intern.
As water is needed for every aspect of household and farm activity, including the care of HIV/AIDS patients, and as women are expected to provide it, any improvement in its availability benefits women and girls. Community based “water points” are being built – supervised by women – and latrines for girls at schools. Only a few months ago electricity came to her village. Access to water is an aspect of poverty reduction, but the real issue is the equality of women in labor and decision making. Ms. Ickua closed by saying that before she came to university, she just took poverty for granted—“this is how things are.” Now she is able to see it as part of a broader worldwide social issue. Lorraine Loken, Water Environment Federation, and David Kashi, New York State Recipient of the Stockholm Junior Water Prize.
Faye Keller, Pumped Up for Peace, and Henna Saljooki, Long Island (NY) student, Half Hollow Hills High School East.
In one project, the students used material such as old jeans to make and decorate bags in their fashion clubs and filled the bags with toilet articles and school supplies. They have also had fashion shows at school as well as sales and exhibitions to raise money. Proceeds from these projects, along with the bags they had made, were sent to Peru. Henna was thrilled to see a photo of a girl wearing a bag she had designed! They have raised thousands of dollars to construct wells in villages so that the children have time to go to school. The club raises people’s awareness of how much water is wasted when we run long showers or wash our cars. It gives young people a way to help others, and demonstrates how through an interest in fashion students can starts similar clubs in their schools. One person can make an impact – an important message to both teachers and students. |
| Closing Keynote AddressDr. Peter Gleick | |
Dr. Peter Gleick is Co-Founder and President, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security.
In a comprehensive overview, Dr. Gleick described two main ways of dealing with water challenges that have emerged. The “hard” path recognized throughout the twentieth century relies on large, concrete, centrally administered projects that deliver and take away at enormous benefit and enormous cost. Even while these programs have resulted in treated drinking water, the curbing of typhoid, numerous economic, social and sometimes environmental improvements for some, this path alone is not enough and will not reach the millennium goals for 2015. But the second, the “soft” path, while drawing upon centralizing information, complements the investments of the first path by decentralizing particularly the social side of our systems by delivering to diversified needs at the community level. We now certainly have crises, but many are humanly and usually politically driven and therefore inexcusable. Dr. Gleick cited the fact that although arsenic was discovered in wells in Bangladesh ten years ago, the population is still drinking this water because the social and distribution issues remain unsolved. He went on to mention various historic conflicts from ancient times to the present over water sources and distribution. Dr. Gleick stressed that the environment is definitely altering and is specifically threatened by human activity. Some rivers no longer reach their deltas and biological and chemical contaminants, which in the 1960’s were pretty well known, are now developing further complications requiring better monitoring and quality enforcement. But there seems to be a well-connected capacity, perhaps campaign, to ignore these conditions, and not only in the United States. Teachers have long taught the hydrologic cycle of precipitation, evaporation, and run off, but need to expand it to the “hydro-political cycle,” which will involve seeing that politicians are trained to understand engineering. Politically complex and dangerous situations of this millennium arise because half the land of the planet has hydrological/water-based problems stemming from shared boundaries and nervous neighbors. Dr. Gleick also emphasized certain connections: crises worsen because the population is growing and the amount of water is fixed; there is no problem that is not made worse by population pressure; it is critical to notice and act upon the fact that educated women are less likely to have too many children. So far solutions, especially for water supply and sanitation problems, are inadequate to deal with issues of scale, but it is also indisputable that we have the money if we choose to spend it in the right ways. Dr. Gleick maintained that the water crisis is resolvable—absolute scarcity is not the problem. It is the unevenness of distribution that is the problem. The “soft” path emphasizes sustainability. The “hard” path has many costs that need revising to different standards of impact particularly on the economy and the environment. We have the technology to rethink the use of rainwater and the treatment of wastewater. Why, for example, are golf courses and toilets still using potable water? The goal is quality of life delivered by governments and services. Rethinking the efficiency of water use is essential both locally and globally. The U.S. already uses less water than twenty years ago despite its larger population and economy for two reasons: efficiency and a change toward a service economy. Smart economies view water both as an economic good to be paid for and also as a social good to be protected in the public interest and supplied free if necessary. Often the most effective program is locally designed, especially when local people are not urban and live in families. Dr. Gleick is optimistic that transition to the “soft” path is already underway and will become more apparent as we become increasingly aware of the technical innovations and the social implications of how we manage the world’s water. | |